CMite wrote:Here we find “clarifications”, such as “well yes, Kathy levitated twice, but she only saw the mirror-hag once.” Thats great, but do you understand how it changes nothing with regard to finding out if the case was true or not?
Yes. Our main goal is to peel away the myths and misconceptions from the case. We have a lot of info that does just that, but not everything here is specific towards that goal. I never claimed otherwise. CMite wrote:Verifying what Lutz said is laudable for reasons of completeness, true enough – but do you think if the Texas Paranormal Whoevers had come to this website and read something like “The book says the hooded figure’s eyes were red, but this is untrue – as George said in this interview on Coast-to-Coast AM in 1985 (listen at this link), the hooded figure’s eyes were actually green” it would’ve changed their verdict? Why not, if coming here and clarifying what Lutz said counts as research? Firstly, I am not asking them to change their verdict.
