Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can you do a: sh spanning-tree vlan 100 or 102?

sh spanning-tree VLAN
0
Posted

Can you do a: sh spanning-tree vlan 100 or 102?

0

It’s true, there’s not, but that sounds like a chicken-egg problem. Though, actually, ESXi specifically doesn’t do spanning tree because their virtual switches don’t talk to each other, preventing loops (according to their docs). Also, vlan2 is working, and I would expect it to have the same problem as the other vlans. I did try adding: switchport nonegotiate spanning-tree portfast trunk which I saw used on another website discussing esx trunking, but that doesn’t help. My understanding of “portfast” is that that basically shuts off spanning tree and just forwards regardless. #sho spanning-tree vlan 1-4094 VLAN0001 Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp Root ID Priority 32768 Address 0011.5d6f.c001 This bridge is the root Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 32768 Address 0011.5d6f.c001 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Aging Time 300 Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type—————- —- — ——— ——– ——————–

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123