Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?

0
Posted

Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?

0

OBJECTIVE: To compare elements of the Bishop score and corresponding sonographic measurements before induction of labor, and assess how predictive factors can be used in a clinical setting. DESIGN: Prospective comparative clinical study. SETTING: Secondary referral center, university hospital. POPULATION: A total of 275 women scheduled for induction of labor. METHODS: Fetal head descent to the perineum was assessed with transperineal ultrasound. Cervical length, posterior angle, and dilatation were evaluated with transvaginal ultrasound followed by Bishop score without knowledge of the ultrasound measurements. RESULTS: Univariable regression analyses of successful induction were significant for digital assessment of cervical dilatation, ultrasound measured fetal head-perineum distance < or =40 mm, ultrasound measured cervical length < or =25 mm, and ultrasound measured posterior cervical angle >90 degrees. After adjusting for maternal factors in a multivariable model, estimates were si

0

To compare elements of the Bishop score and corresponding sonographic measurements before induction of labor, and assess how predictive factors can be used in a clinical setting.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123