Can the wording and order of the double tradition material in the Greek Logia be reconstructed?
The LTH is similar to the Two Document Hypothesis in that both posit that Matthew and Luke independently used a hypothetical documentary source to obtain the double tradition. The same redaction-critical principles apply to the reconstruction of the wording and order of material of the double tradition in Q (assuming the Two Document Hypothesis) as apply to the reconstruction of the wording and order of material of the double tradition in the Greek Logia (assuming the LTH). The results of the work of Q scholars in reconstructing the wording and order of Q from Matthew and Luke can therefore be used for reconstructing the wording and order of the double tradition from Matthew and Luke on the basis of the LTH. In this respect, the redaction-critical reconstruction of Q found in J. M. Robinson, P. Hoffmann, and J. S. Kloppenborg, The Critical Edition of Q, (Minneapolis, 2000) , can be understood to be a redaction-critical reconstruction of the double tradition of the Greek Logia posited b
