Can the league simplify things and adopt a rule to require automatic dismissal when a bowler misses two weeks in a row without an explanation?
No. A member cannot be dismissed without following Rule 115a or 115b. The rule could state that a bowler who owes league fees will be subject to dismissal, but not automatically. Written charges must be filed with the board, and the member must be notified of the meeting and be given the opportunity to defend themselves.
Related Questions
- Can the league simplify things and adopt a rule to require automatic dismissal when a bowler misses two weeks in a row without an explanation?
- Can the league adopt a rule requiring written resignation, to determine the exact date a bowler is no longer a member?
- Can our league or association require more equipment than required in the rule book ?
