Can the hoaxers claims be refuted, and how?
Well, the biggest thing about hoaxers is that they seem to turn up the day after a formation arrives and deliberately ‘act suspicious’. The psychology aspect makes researchers wonder if they had anything to do with the circles, even if they were miles away the previous night. After all, it’s far easier to arrive on the scene and pretend to know something you don’t than it is to actually creep into the field in the darkness and produce geometrically accurate formations. Some claims can be refuted as different groups of hoaxers have inadvertently claimed the same formation in the past. This makes me laugh slightly because they obviously haven’t got a clue what other people are up to. Even when hoaxers ‘own up’ to circles, they have no evidence to support their claims. I could claim that I invented the Loch Ness monster. So what? I think they need to provide proof of their creations as openly as researchers supply research. Unfortunately, hoaxers are out simply to deceive, so you’re not g
Related Questions
- The guidance does not mention the possibility of the childs permanent exclusion being refuted and if this happens, should the child therefore be included in part B of the indicator?
- Are there examples where molecular anthropology has refuted some kind of past knowledge about history?
- Is National Socialism refuted by the defeat of Nazi Germany in WWII?
