Can testing of furniture products conducted for non-CARB-approved emission standards be considered reasonable prudent precautions under the rule?
Testing of furniture products for the non-CARB approved emission standards would not constitute reasonable prudent precautions. A finished good could be made with non-complying composite wood, but due to the application of a laminate or a coating, products may be able to pass the non-CARB approved emission standards. If CARB were to deconstruct the piece of furniture and conduct our finished product testing, we would find that it contained non-complying composite wood products.
Related Questions
- Can testing of finished furniture products conducted for non-CARB-approved emission standards be considered reasonable prudent precautions under the rule?
- Can testing of furniture products conducted for non-CARB-approved emission standards be considered reasonable prudent precautions under the rule?
- What reliability testing has Honeywell conducted to ensure that these products will meet the projected life times at temperature?
