Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can SPMDs be used for both integrative and equilibrium partition sampling? What are the pros and cons of the two approaches?

0
Posted

Can SPMDs be used for both integrative and equilibrium partition sampling? What are the pros and cons of the two approaches?

0

The answer to the first question depends on the magnitude of the Kows of the target analytes, the SPMD design and environmental conditions. Investigators have shown that SPMDs (standard configuration as described in the tutorial) integratively sample compounds with log SPMD-water partition coefficients (KSPMDs) 5.0 during exposures of less than 1 month at 18 oC, and a flow velocity <1 cm/sec. Note that in some cases small amounts of dispersed carbon adsorbent in SPMD triolein increased SPMD capacity, and permitted integrative sampling of even low Kow compounds (e.g., naphthalene log Kow = 3.4 and for low Kows, KSPMD Kow) as well. Also, it has been shown for compounds with log Kows < 4.0, 90% of equilibrium concentrations may be achieved in < 40 days using the standard SPMD design. The time to equilibrium can be decreased by increasing the flow-rate of water and air (the likely switch to membrane control limits the effects of flow for compounds with log Kows < 4.5) and the temperature.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123