Can someone explain the scientific evidence to support the creationist theory?
As Shay conclusively shows, creationist ‘evidence’ is what the rest of us call ‘drivel’. It consists of misinterpreting science as much as possible, and making up a few strawman claims about evolution to rail against. EDIT: As the poster above shows, they also decide to mix up the whole abiogenesis question into the mix too, and generally lie about that as well. EDIT2: Actually, no1home gives a far better example of how hilarious some creationist nonsense gets. I especially loved his point number 7, which just shows how happily they’ll lie through their back teeth.
