Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can PKC Inhibitors Block the Protection by Three-Cycle IP When They Are Administered Before the First Cycle of Transient Ischemia?

0
10 Posted

Can PKC Inhibitors Block the Protection by Three-Cycle IP When They Are Administered Before the First Cycle of Transient Ischemia?

0
10

As shown in Figure 2, three cycles of IP significantly protected the heart from infarction: the median necrosis value was only 0.6% of the area at risk (necrosis values in all groups are expressed as the median) compared with 61.9% in the corresponding control group (P <.0001 versus control). One-cycle IP (with long stabilization) also protected the heart from infarction (36.7% of the area at risk infarcted, P = .05 versus corresponding control), but the extent of protection was significantly less than that obtained with three-cycle IP (P < .001 versus three-cycle IP). Shortening the stabilization period before inducing transient ischemia in hearts preconditioned with one-cycle IP from a total of 60 minutes to only 5 minutes significantly improved the protection obtained with one-cycle IP (10.4% necrosis in short-stabilization one-cycle IP versus 36.7% of the area at risk infarcted in the long-stabilization one-cycle IP, P < .05). Shortening of the stabilization period had no effect on

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123