Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can Permanent-Income Theory Explain Cross-Sectional Consumption Patterns?

0
10 Posted

Can Permanent-Income Theory Explain Cross-Sectional Consumption Patterns?

0
10

Author InfoJohn Sabelhaus Jeffrey A. Groen Abstract The prediction that consumption-income ratios should decline as income rises in cross-sectional data is a feature of Friedman’s (1957) permanent income hypothesis and other consumption-smoothing models. The theory thus provides a link between longitudinal income data and cross-sectional expenditure data: given measured income variability and a functional relationship between consumption and permanent income, we predict cross-sectional expenditure patterns and compare those predictions to actual values. Our approach cannot explain the actual skewness in consumption-income ratios under even the strictest consumptionsmoothing model, which implies that income measurement error or other anomalies are affecting the data. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technolog Download InfoTo download: If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123