Can any evolutionist explain the retinal cascade?
If you can describe your understanding of what the retinal cascade *IS*, then I can know at what level to answer your question. I.e. do you know the names of the proteins involved? Do you know what an opsin gene is? Do you even know what a protein cascade *IS*, much less how it works? Or do I first have to explain all of that too? Sorry, but I’ve run into too many Creationists who shoot off a phrase like “retinal cascade” without any CLUE what it is, or how it works. They just read it in some Creationist site somewhere, and it sounds all “scientifical” so they throw it out there as if the ‘evolutionists’ will go “Oh, crap … those brilliant Creationists know so much about biology they have stumped us *again*!!” In order to explain how a structure or biochemical process evolved, there first has to be understanding about what it is that needs explaining. Creationists love to leave the burden on the ‘evolutionists’ to first have to give a full explanation of the phenomenon being explaine
