Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can a tool that uses a textual notation be considered UML compliant?

0
Posted

Can a tool that uses a textual notation be considered UML compliant?

0

Yes. The UML specification separates abstract syntax (what kinds of elements are available and how they can be used together) from concrete syntax (how to present those elements in diagrams). The specification states that there are two different types of compliance: • abstract syntax compliance (the types of elements and how they relate to each other) • concrete syntax compliance (the notation) A UML tool must provide at least one of the types of compliance. The TextUML Toolkit aims to be abstract syntax compliant, but not to be concrete syntax compliant.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123