Can a state-fund that just reimburses private parties (and is not a party to the actual contract) impose PFP terms?
Yes, unless there are explicit, state-specific legal barriers. A state-fund that now reimburses private parties for the costs incurred by the parties’ privately-contracted cleanup firms can instead set Pay For Performance milestones as criteria for fund reimbursement regardless of whatever terms of payment the private parties may have agreed to among themselves.
Related Questions
- Do they use a sales contract to spell out the terms of the sale and allow each party to define their expectations of the transaction?
- Can a state-fund that just reimburses private parties (and is not a party to the actual contract) impose PFP terms?
- Is my party private or will my guests share the inflatables and party rooms with guests from other parties?
