Can a Public Insurance Plan Increase Competition and Lower the Costs of Health Reform?
Source: John Holahan and Linda J. Blumberg, Urban Institute, October 3, 2008 From the abstract: Senator Barack Obama, along with others, has proposed developing a public plan that would compete with private insurers within an organized health insurance marketplace. The argument is that a public plan would have lower administrative costs and more ability to control provider payment rates. This paper assesses these arguments concluding that there would be administrative cost savings and lower provider payment rates but not as much as is often asserted. Strong private insurers that offer good value for premiums charged would survive. But most important, the amount of real competition in both insurance and hospital markets would be enhanced.
Related Questions
- Obamas idea of a public insurance plan to compete with private ones is meeting resistance. Will the alternative of health insurance cooperatives suffice?
- Does health reform change my childs insurance or health plan through Child Health Plus?
- Can a Public Insurance Plan Increase Competition and Lower the Costs of Health Reform?
