Can a plaintiff bring a civil RICO claim against a defendant even if the defendant did not commit any crime?
Every RICO claim must be based on a criminal violation or, as the statute states, an “act of racketeering.” “Acts of racketeering” are all serious crimes and are listed in section 1961(1) of the RICO Act. A civil plaintiff must not only prove that the defendant engaged in acts if racketeering, but must also prove that these acts constituted a “pattern” and must prove all of the other elements of a civil RICO claim. The burden of proof that must be sustained by a civil plaintiff is, however, less onerous than the burden imposed upon criminal prosecutors. A civil plaintiff need only convince a jury by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant committed the acts of racketeering; whereas, a criminal prosecutor must establish the acts of racketeering beyond the reasonable doubt of the jury. The other difference between a civil and criminal RICO claim is the resulting penalties. If a plaintiff succeeds in establishing a civil RICO claim, he or she will be awarded monetary damages, in pa
Related Questions
- Am I correct in assuming that RICOs statute of limitations cannot bar a civil RICO claim so long as the defendant continues to engage in acts of racketeering?
- Can a plaintiff bring a civil RICO claim against a defendant even if the defendant did not commit any crime?
- Do insurance policies cover damages awarded a plaintiff in a civil RICO claim?
