Can a court indicate how they would like YRO requirements to be sequenced?
The court has the power to set the end date for individual requirements and this may have an impact on the way the YOT sequences requirements in a young person’s order. It is however, taking account of court advice, the YOTs’ role to deliver the intervention as effectively as possible taking account of the court’s indications, the victims’ wishes where appropriate, the young person’s risks and needs and local provision.
Related Questions
- Does the definition of "court" include administrative hearing proceedings? Do the same requirements apply to the executive branch agencies responsible for conducting those hearings?
- Some YRO requirements necessitate the court being informed by the Secretary of State of their availability, how will this be done?
- Can DOJ reconcile the differing requirements for providing court interpreters in federal courts and in the state courts?