Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Call me selfish, but I think its some other burgs turn to stand in as the symbol of infidel imperialism. What brings out that feeble hope on a beautiful autumn morning?

0
Posted

Call me selfish, but I think its some other burgs turn to stand in as the symbol of infidel imperialism. What brings out that feeble hope on a beautiful autumn morning?

0

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Good thing we can ignore Islamophobic rantings from a bunch like that. What’s that? They’re peaceniks? Accredited lefties? Oh, dear. The ongoing failure of imagination Prior to 9/11, most Americans found the idea that international terrorists could mount an attack on their homeland and kill thousands of innocent citizens not just unlikely, but inconceivable. Psychologically, Americans imagined that they lived in a security bubble. Terrorist attacks, including those on U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, occurred elsewhere. These beliefs were reinforced by the conventional wisdom among terrorism experts, who argued that terrorists sought not mass casualties but rather mass sympathy through limited attacks that called attention to their cause. As we approach the fifth year without a second successful terrorist attack upon U.S. soil, a chorus of skeptics now suggests that 9/11 was a 100-year flood. They conveniently forget the deadly explosions in Bali

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123