By making it easy to run Windows virtualized on Linux, isn Novell undercutting its own Mono project, which shares a similar goal?
Mono provides developers a way to run applications designed using Microsoft .NET technologies to run on Linux and other platforms. Its main focus is the Linux desktop, where Mono has been leveraged to build a series of new services, including search, music playback, and more. Virtualization focuses on maximizing the value of server hardware by running multiple operating systems. It is used for server consolidation, workload balancing and other corporate needs. So while both approaches are designed to give customers flexibility in their IT systems, their focuses are quite different.
Mono provides developers with a way to run applications designed using Microsoft .NET technologies to run on Linux and other platforms. Its main focus is the Linux desktop, where Mono has been leveraged to build a series of new services, including search, music playback and more. Virtualization focuses on maximizing the value of server hardware by running multiple operating systems. It is used for server consolidation, workload balancing and other corporate needs. So while both approaches are designed to give customers flexibility in their IT systems, their focuses are quite different.
Related Questions
- What are the advantages of Linux, since Im losing some user-friendliness, my ability to run some Windows applications, and easy use of new devices?
- By making it easy to run Windows virtualized on Linux, isn Novell undercutting its own Mono project, which shares a similar goal?
- By making it easy to run Windows virtualized on Linux, isn’t Novell undercutting its own Mono project, which shares a similar goal?
