Burns, OR: How does this DEIS relate to Oregons Clean Stream Initiative, National Resource Inventory, Standards for Rangeland Health, and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing?
In general, the BLM standards for rangeland health are broad goal statements. The BLM standards for rangeland health are not equivalent to standards one would find in the Draft EISs. Standards in the Draft EISs are generally required management actions that address how to achieve objectives, and in general are more specific than broad, goal statements. The BLM standards have been “rolled into” the Draft EISs as a part of the Desired Range of Future Conditions. The BLM guidelines for livestock grazing management offer guidance in the selection of practices and treatments for management of livestock grazing in the attainment of standards. Guidelines in the Draft EISs are suggested actions, priorities, processes, or prescriptions that are useful in meeting objectives. Guidelines in the Draft EISs are not required. The main difference between BLM guidelines and guidelines in the Draft EISs is that the BLM guidelines tend to be more fine-scale (or site-specific). The BLM guidelines will be
Related Questions
- Burns, OR: How does this DEIS relate to Oregons Clean Stream Initiative, National Resource Inventory, Standards for Rangeland Health, and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing?
- Why doesn" t resource network contain an inventory or logic models for the types of programs United Ways typically fund?
- What is the National Mutual Aid and Resource Management System Initiative?
