Based on the fact that the earths rotation was affected by the most recent quake, does it have any impact on the Bradley model? Can anything ever impact the model?
Again, my opinion: Anything I could offer regarding the 12/26/2004 undersea earthquake in Indonesia, etc., comes from my mind and thought processes, not something I’ve read. That said, it’s my belief that the quake would be a consequence of built up forces. Following this line of reasoning, then one must look at the forces and where they come from and perhaps why they are as they are. It seems to me that the forces would affect Bradley as they build up since the position of our solar system’s objects are all tied together by the balance of gravity and centrifugal forces. If the Bradley concept is for real, and the observed evidence suggests that is, then Bradley is a representation of the forces which would naturally affect the Earth … not the other way around, i.e., what happens on Earth affecting Bradley. The Earth wobbles naturally anyway, it’s called precession and takes 26,000 years for the point directly above the North Pole to circumscribe a circle. The star Polaris is nearly
