August 9th, 2007 at 9:16 PM Land speculation is arguably a game of chance. Are all landholders therefore in violation of this policy?
• 31 Blinders Off Says: August 9th, 2007 at 9:16 PM The major problem I’ve discerned with all this isn’t whether online gambling is illegal, wrong or right. It has been with the obscurity of this ruling as well as the possible result, namely, “If we catch you gambling, you may be permabanned without warning.” This causes concern among people who play games such as Slingo, enter contests and other such. I don’t think anyone minds being told, “This is a gambling issue, needs to be stopped.” It’s a whole nuther thing to suddenly find yourself banned because you crossed some indiscernable line that had no clear-cut edges. It’s not the policy; it’s the way it was done. • 32 Ann Otoole Says: August 9th, 2007 at 9:16 PM sounds like lucky chairs are allowed. no pay in.
Related Questions
- August 9th, 2007 at 8:40 PM "or whether Barack Obama will win the Democratic primary." WOw, or how about if a ‘virtual stock’ goes up or down? It sounds like you just banned WSE/AVIX etc.
- August 9th, 2007 at 9:16 PM Land speculation is arguably a game of chance. Are all landholders therefore in violation of this policy?
- August 9th, 2007 at 10:12 PM How about a refund for the lack of good code skills and poor planing?
