Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

August 9th, 2007 at 8:40 PM “or whether Barack Obama will win the Democratic primary.” WOw, or how about if a ‘virtual stock’ goes up or down? It sounds like you just banned WSE/AVIX etc.

0
Posted

August 9th, 2007 at 8:40 PM “or whether Barack Obama will win the Democratic primary.” WOw, or how about if a ‘virtual stock’ goes up or down? It sounds like you just banned WSE/AVIX etc.

0

• 5 Inso Says: August 9th, 2007 at 8:40 PM 1 – it’s about the money, and keeping credit card companies happy (so residents can by more $L) 2 – it’s about the money and not getting prosecuted for violation of US gaming laws (where Linden is, even if the players live where it is legal) 3 – it’s about the money where Linden will act to protect itself, but won’t say THIS or THAT game is illegal since they WANT residents to spend money anyways possible (and thus be buying more L$) • 6 Kitty Tully Says: August 9th, 2007 at 8:42 PM Good question, Charter Member. If there is no way an item can be transferred, its “value” is arguable. I’d like an official response to that question. • 7 Prim Hammerer Says: August 9th, 2007 at 8:42 PM Welcome back to First Life • 8 Tanner Asbrink! Says: August 9th, 2007 at 8:43 PM Well, I’m not very happy about the wagering policies, but at least sploders are still okay. Ova and out! d-_-b Tanner Asbrink • 9 Bradley Bracken Says: August 9th, 2007 at 8:44 PM Thank

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123