Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

ATF officers swore under oath in court and before Congress that they were ambushed by the Davidians. Why then does “Waco: The Rules of Engagement” say that the ATF started shooting first?

0
Posted

ATF officers swore under oath in court and before Congress that they were ambushed by the Davidians. Why then does “Waco: The Rules of Engagement” say that the ATF started shooting first?

0

The film does not say that the ATF shot first. It presents both sides of that issue and leaves any conclusions about which side is telling the truth to the viewer. However, the fact that all of the evidence that would provide proof or a preponderance of evidence as to which side shot first was either destroyed or made to disappear by FBI and ATF agents, the only logical and honest deduction is that it was the ATF who fired first. That conclusion has been confirmed by interviews with many who were present after the film was completed.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123