At first glance the method appeared to work well and seemed to be relatively fast. Two questions remained, though: How fast is it in comparison to using the Document Fragment technique I outlined before and does it work for all the strange use-cases that exist?
• I created a test case to compare the three types of injection: The type we’ve been using in jQuery prior to the upcoming 1.3 release, the new Document Fragment technique we’ll be using in jQuery 1.3, and a case using insertAdjacentHTML (where applicable). While both the Document Fragment and insertAdjacentHTML cases were significantly faster than the old techniques used in jQuery the Document Fragment technique ended up being marginally faster in IE 6 (50ms vs. 80ms for insertAdjacentHTML). • There’s a huge problem with insertAdjacentHTML: It doesn’t work on all HTML elements in IE 6 (specifically it doesn’t work on table, tbody, thead, or tr elements). Having gaps in the functionality is very undesirable (attempting to use insertAdjacentHTML on those elements causes an exception to pop up in IE 6). • It doesn’t work on XML documents. Of course neither does innerHTML (at least not until browsers start to implement HTML 5 more completely). We’re stuck doing the traditional techniques
Related Questions
- At first glance the method appeared to work well and seemed to be relatively fast. Two questions remained, though: How fast is it in comparison to using the Document Fragment technique I outlined before and does it work for all the strange use-cases that exist?
- What is a fast method of splitting up a file that contains multiple samples?
- Can a forensic document examiner compare fax copies for comparison?
