As it is still in the process of evolution, where are the scopes for improvement?
I think there is a scope of improvement everywhere. Any channel wants to constantly improve. The worst thing you can do in a (news) channel is be smug or complacent. It has been a great month just in terms of big stories. But a lot still needs to be done. It is not just about breaking stories, it is also about the entire package. I must admit that packaging is important, but ultimately it s all about editorial content. For us, that is critical. Everything else flows from making the content as good as it can be. Still, we have to constantly improve. I won t go into specifics, but I think the entire package has a long way to go. What, according to you,can be improved content-wise? I don t think we can say that this is what we need to do or that s what we need to do. As I said, unless you realise that there is a large scope of improvement, you will never improve. The easy and soft option for me is to say the product has been relatively well received and people more or less have come up wi
Related Questions
- I am working long hours as it is. How will I be able to find even more time to devote to the business improvement and planning process?
- Has anyone had success/experience divorcing process improvement initiatives from corporate cost cutting efforts?
- Can PathWaysTM report be used for the yield and/or process improvement?
