As a multi-site grantee, am I expected to perform a multi-site evaluation and compare findings to national data?
This depends on your evaluation design. If you are a multi-site grantee, it would be logical for you to evaluate at least a representative sample of your operating sites, if not all of the sites. The most important factor is that the sites you choose to evaluate are appropriate within the context of your evaluation design and methodology, and representative of all of your sites, as opposed to selecting any particular number or type of sites. 16. As a national grantee that serves as an umbrella organization for many different kinds of service activities (i.e. we support mentoring, health, public safety, and environmental programs) what should I evaluate? You and your internal or independent evaluator need to determine what to evaluate. You may want to consider focusing your evaluation on what you are already measuring with your performance measures. If you have multiple and very different performance measures, you may want to evaluate elements common to all your programs, such as volunt
Related Questions
- How should a grantee calculate the budget for Data Collection and Evaluation costs? Is there a recommended or maximum amount that grantees should budget for Data Collection and Evaluation costs?
- Why does national data for the MPI date from so many different years? Isn’t it unfair to compare countries if the statistics in one case are five years older than in another?
- As a multi-site grantee, am I expected to perform a multi-site evaluation and compare findings to national data?
