Aren the problems with eszett and final sigma just the same as with l, I, and 1?
No, The eszett and sigma are fundamentally different than I (capital i), l (lowercase L), and 1 (digit one). With the following (using a digit 1), all browsers will go to the same location, whether they old or new: http://goog1e.com In the following hypothetical example using a top-level domain “xx”, browsers that use IDNA2003 will go to a different location than browsers that use a strict version of IDNA2008, unless the registry for xx puts into place a bundling strategy. http://gießen.xx The same goes for Greek sigma, which is a more common character in Greek than the eszett is in German.
Related Questions
- Why does Unicode encode a separate character for the final sigma in Greek? Doesn that violate the character-glyph model?
- If I use general purpose gelcoat for kitchen countertop production, will it cause any problems at the final product?
- Does the enforcement date above applies to first station (including T/L) or final destination?
