Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Aren’t IT auditors meant to stop (IT) frauds?

auditors frauds meant
0
Posted

Aren’t IT auditors meant to stop (IT) frauds?

0

NO! At least not directly, unless the frauds are perpetrated within the IT audit function anyway. Audit independence means that auditors do not form part of the routine system of controls in operational areas of an organization – that dubious honour usually belongs to “management” or, more broadly, “someone else”. Managers and staff are responsible for designing, implementing, operating and maintaining the appropriate system of controls to prevent fraud or other control failures (e.g. accidental loss of key data, or even the keys to the fire safe). Auditors are responsible for examining and commenting on those controls but again it is management’s duty to respond appropriately to audit reports and recommendations. You might say that auditors are irresponsible.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123