Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Arent ATA drives considered less reliable than SCSI or Fiber drives?

ATA drives fiber SCSI
0
Posted

Arent ATA drives considered less reliable than SCSI or Fiber drives?

0

No. With the exception of the motor and the controller card interface, the drives are virtually the same. ATA drives outnumber SCSI and Fiber drives thousands to one and therefore, the manufacturers have a vested interest in maintaining a very high reliability factor with ATA drives. ATA drives generate significantly less heat, have fewer vibration issues, and are used in tens of millions of computer systems, personal video recorders (PVR), most phone systems around the world, medical systems etc. The Seagate and IBM drives Nexsan currently uses have a 600,000-hour MTBF. This means that in a 14 drive configuration one drive could fail every five years. Since RAID systems are redundant, this will not result in data loss and the system would automatically rebuild onto the Hot Spare drive.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123