Arent animals better off on fur farms, where they are fed and protected, than they are out in the wild, where they can die of starvation, disease, or predation?
A similar argument was used to support the claim that black people were better off being slaves on plantations than being free men and women! Animals on fur farms suffer so much that it is inconceivable that they could be worse off in the wild. The wild isnt wild to the animals who live thereits their home. The fact that they might suffer there is no reason to ensure that they suffer in captivity.
Related Questions
- Arent animals better off on fur farms, where they are fed and protected, than they are out in the wild, where they can die of starvation, disease, or predation?
- Aren’t animals better off on fur farms, where they are fed and protected, than they are out in the wild, where they can die of starvation, disease, or predation?
- Do Wild Animals Transmit Disease?
