Are you saying that the more time a person spends in Logicracy, the more power he has?
This is the case only if democratic or weighted-democratic analysis is used. You can do that analysis if you want, but the best analysis is that analysis that is unaffected by number of votes–a competence vs. opinion scatter plot. In a competence vs. opinion scatter plot, adding more points to the low-competence end of the scatter plot only serves to make the slope of a line fitted to the scatter plot more obvious. Such a scatter plot requires only enough high-competence (and low-competence) votes to overcome any outlier removal process. That’s the whole purpose of fitting a curve to such a scatter plot. The main purpose for requiring users to exert mental effort for the opportunity to vote is to eliminate the danger of a bot answering opinion questions ad infinitum. It is a pretty good solution. Not only does it virtually eliminate the danger of bots (see the question on bots ), it further weights the quality of votes according to the intelligence and perseverance of the voters. Yet
