Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are you refering to the online saccade detection by the eyelink (operator PC) itself, or did you program this code yourself?

0
Posted

Are you refering to the online saccade detection by the eyelink (operator PC) itself, or did you program this code yourself?

0

I am not aware of begin_realtime_mode & end_realtime_mode functions. I presume these are part of the new API’s. If so, they’re not part of the eyelinktoolbox (for that reason). In the eyelinktoolbox code there are two examples (eyelinkexample.m & eyelinkeventexample.m) of how to create reasonably fast gaze contingent experiments. But, c will always out perform matlab code. So, if you need to do a lot in real-time, and can’t prepare your stimuli, I would suggest to use c. You can of course also use a hybrid approach, and only c-code the time critical part of your experiment, and create a mex file for that. I don’t believe you can compile PsychToolbox and eyelink toolbox code as such (I have never tried). There’s also a few ways in which you can improve performance of the eyelink, e.g. do not use filtering, shaves 4 ms of the response time (but gives less accurate saccade estimates).

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123