Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are we really talking about creating more significant technical standards work?

0
Posted

Are we really talking about creating more significant technical standards work?

0

• What about identifying best practices, and allow them to be pursued • C27.1 is going to edit guidelines around document-management functions and the Web. What about the issues and requirements of Web-enabled document management. • Don Post says they want co-editors on the C27.1 activity • Looking for clarification of a framework on where different activities would fit • Also talking about an update of the RFP standard for standard elements to be sure to cover in an RFP (as covered by TR27). Need an update that would be Information Management centric, not just Image Management centric. • Looking for a common RFP base document with modules for specialization to Image, Document, and other management requirements. • Pointing out that this is not just WebDAV, and we are looking at interoperability generally around document management and the Web.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123