Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

are virulent clones responsible for serious streptococcal infections?

0
Posted

are virulent clones responsible for serious streptococcal infections?

0

From the mid-1980s, numerous reports of invasive group A streptococcal infections suggested that “highly virulent clones” were responsible. However, there have been virtually no extensive reports and comparisons of diverse temporal and geographic community isolates from uncomplicated throat infections to confirm the hypothesis. A unique collection of such “control” strains allowed in-depth assessment of association of M serotypes 1, 3, and 28 “clones” with invasive infections. Clones were defined by using small-fragment chromosomal restriction-enzyme analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and M protein gene (emm) sequencing. After comparison with controls, no clone within these M serotypes had statistically increased association with invasive infections. The prevalence of specific virulence-associated clones appeared to essentially reflect their normal population prevalence. Although this does exclude other potential streptococcal factors, these findings suggest that host factors

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123