Are They Using A Straw Man Arguement?
The whole premise seems like a straw man: 1) The elections weren’t fixed because they were not ALL instantly and simultaneously coordinated by a single person. 2) Since there is no credible evidence that a single solitary Dr. Evil-style figure gave marching orders to a few thousand people than that means that the elections were fair and valid. Bullshit. As has already been repeatedly pointed out (and consistently ignored) the problem is that the voting process itself(before, during and after)is so lax, so totally without any oversight that hundreds of individuals can just change things without any real risk or effort. Something the doubters can’t quite seem to grasp. Uncounted ballots are “secured” in unlocked rooms and can easily be stolen by literally anyone and tossed in the garbage or shredded. Voting machines are sometimes stored in people’s houses overnight and can be tampered with by anyone. The doubters seem to (mistakenly) think voting machines are surrounded by armed gaurds i
