Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are they a Cost-Effective Alternative to Traditional Agricultural Conservation Spending?

0
Posted

Are they a Cost-Effective Alternative to Traditional Agricultural Conservation Spending?

0

Author InfoGreenhalgh, Suzie Taylor, Michael Selman, Mindy Guiling, Jenny Abstract Agricultural practices continue to degrade water quality and ecosystems worldwide. In the United States, programs like the Department of Agricultureâ s (USDA) Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) target the voluntary adoption of agricultural best management practices (BMPs). Demand for these programs has historically exceeded available funding, so allocating funding to achieve the greatest environmental outcome is essential. In recent years, economists have argued that market mechanisms should be incorporated within government programs to improve their cost-effectiveness. This article presents the results of a reverse auction to allocate funding to reduce phosphorus losses from farms, and compares the results with EQIP funded contracts in the same watershed. Download InfoTo download: If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Inform

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123