Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are there undesirable side effects of mainstream programmes on deprived urban neighbourhoods?

0
Posted

Are there undesirable side effects of mainstream programmes on deprived urban neighbourhoods?

0

• The New Towns Policy (1950-1985) and the building of large council estates (1950-1980) to tackle slum clearance, are historical examples of programmes being successful in achieving their own objectives, but which had undesirable side effects on deprived neighbourhoods; this persists to some extent because of the long life of new housing and infrastructure. The way in which local authorities prioritise the allocation of council housing has the general effect of concentrating more deprived families into the already most deprived neighbourhoods, where vacancies are most likely to occur. This process enhances the concentration of deprivation and makes it more difficult to secure neighbourhood regeneration.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123