Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are there any False Claims Act provisions that are less commonly used in qui tam cases?

ACT cases Commonly False qui TAM Used
0
Posted

Are there any False Claims Act provisions that are less commonly used in qui tam cases?

0

Yes. Less commonly used, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(4) makes it unlawful to deliver less property or money to the Government than the amount set forth in the receipt. The provisions of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(5) apply where the Government is given a false receipt for goods, such as where the receipt indicates that 100 muskets were sold to the Army, when in fact the box actually contained only 2 of the guns. Not often utilized, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(6) applies when a Government employee sells Government property without proper authority to do so, which may occur in circumstances where the employee personally pockets the payment received.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123