Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are there any downsides to using FileKeeper?

downsides filekeeper
0
Posted

Are there any downsides to using FileKeeper?

0

The previous file versions retained by FileKeeper occupy a very small percentage (typically, approximately 5-10%) of free space on your computer’s hard disk. However, since FileKeeper stores protected copies very efficiently by only saving the original file plus any changes to the file, and because local hard disks are inexpensive and generally only used to about 45% capacity, the value of user-initiated file recovery and granular continuous data protection vastly outweighs the perceived increase in storage costs.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123