Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are the terms any different from streaming music online?

0
Posted

Are the terms any different from streaming music online?

0

This requires the Rhapsody To Go tier. So to the extent that Rhapsody To Go is different from Rhapsody Unlimited, yes. But from our perspective, having the music on your phone is not much different that sideloading it to a Sansa. This was treated no differently than any other MP3 player. How important is it to launch this in the U.S. before Spotify? That service has a lot of momentum you’re going to have to compete with when it goes live in this country. From our perspective the reason Spotify blew up so big and so fast was it was free. That model isn’t going to happen in the U.S. anytime soon, maybe ever. The U.S. is the market where the labels make all their money. They can’t afford to have a service that doesn’t generate substantial revenues to them suck up all the usage in the United States. Don’t get me wrong, I recognize Spotify has a [fast] client, it’s fast and clean, but if it was $15 [a month] out of the gate, it wouldn’t have a million users. Once you take the free piece awa

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123