Are the Department of Justices demands and remedies reasonable — or sufficient?
I don’t think they would have brought this case if they didn’t think they had good evidence to substantiate their complaint. They know what their case is. Everybody’s been viewing this as Netscape vs. Microsoft. It is not Netscape vs. Microsoft. This is the government vs. Microsoft, based on allegations that the law has been violated by Microsoft. They have found the violations of law in the context of an investigation into the browser market. That’s why Netscape’s mentioned a lot. Q: Well, not the only reason. Netscape is the only other significant browser company. A: Microsoft has tried to spin this as “Oh, this is really just Netscape in another commercial ploy here.” It kind of hides the ball. What’s really going on is the governments are saying Microsoft has violated the law — serious law. Basic antitrust laws are essential if the market is going to work, and if people start screwing around with that, that’s serious, and the governments are stepping in. This is serious for consum
Related Questions
- When would my child go to the California Department of Corrections (CDC) instead of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice?
- Do Department of Justice (DOJ) Title VI implementing regulations prohibit both intentional discrimination and practices that have a discriminatory impact?
- Does the Supreme Court have to accept any normal appeal brought by Microsoft or the Justice Department and states?
