Are the best organizational and human resource management configurations and approaches being used?
2) Since October 1998, what other configurations and/or approaches have been seriously explored? Were any adopted? Were any rejected? Are any changes contemplated in the coming year; and 3) Is there any identifiable duplication in capacities or services in the state? How many duplicative systems — accounting systems, human resources management systems, case management systems, etc. — currently exist? Does the service delivery system now in use minimize or eliminate duplications that existed prior to October 1, 1998? Minnesotas programs are always seeking ways to minimize duplication of effort. As part of these efforts, the individual programs have evaluated their current staff composition and other options to see if they best serve their client population. For example, both Anoka Judicare and Anishinabe explored contracting with a nearby larger program for specific services such as accounting or case reporting and determined that this would not result in cost savings to their program
