Are the actions of the Attorney General of Maryland leading to unnecessary cancer deaths?
In view of the ongoing litigation, it is obviously difficult for me to answer this question. But allow me to point out some pertinent facts and observations: First, as I have mentioned elsewhere, the Attorney General of Maryland has never taken action (which, with his broad discretionary injunctive power would be easy to do) to remove the products from the market. This well may be because, despite his self-appointed mantle as arbiter of consumer health, he has not found one witness out of the hundreds of thousands of medical experts in the United States to challenge the fact that cesium kills cancer cells. Second, many people who had been given a death sentence by conventional medicine and were subsequently saved by cesium, have told us that they are afraid to come forward and talk about their experience out of fear of reprisal by the State. We are certain that many other people have not contacted us out of a similar fear. This fear as well as the pernicious lies promulgated by the Att
Related Questions
- Why is the U.S.A. the world leader in deaths by cancer and nearly every other disease; while China has 1.5 billion people who remain healthy simply by drinking tea?
- What are the risks for women? After lung cancer and breast cancer, colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in women in the United States.
- Are the actions of the Attorney General of Maryland leading to unnecessary cancer deaths?
