Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are social enterprises more effective than non-profits in solving the worlds problems?

0
Posted

Are social enterprises more effective than non-profits in solving the worlds problems?

0

I was sitting down with a friend who is a seasoned sales executive and conversation turned to high-and-mighty topics of solving the world’s problems. He began talking about how the water problems in some third-world countries are 100% solvable but have not been because of a lack of execution on the part of the organizations on the ground there–despite a steady stream of funding and numerous NGO’s, non-profits, and government initiatives trying to solve the problems for decades. He went on to maintain that for-profit “social enterprises” are better positioned to solve the world’s problems because they have built-in, rigid accountability through stakeholders and must drive innovation to stay competitive. Non-profits, on the other hand (he maintained) are usually behind the curve in seeking innovative solutions and have accountability that inhibits growth rather than spurs it. I’m not so sure… What do you think?

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123