Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are self-managing teams worthwhile?

0
Posted

Are self-managing teams worthwhile?

0

by S. Jay Liebowitz , Kevin T. Holden Here we have two world-class corporations, Corning and Motorola, different in many respects, similar in others. Among their important differences is that Corning is unionized, while Motorola, domestically, is not. These companies show that either of these paths can lead to greatness. The secret lies in how effectively each manages its human resources. One interesting similarity is that both organizations are implementing self-managing work teams with apparent success. They have wrestled with the problem of what happens to the traditional foremen and supervisors and have found solutions that work. They have analyzed the financial costs and benefits of self-managing teams and seem pleased with the results. Corning(1), which has become a model for others to emulate, was rated the thirteenth most admired corporation in America by Fortune magazine (February 7, 1994), and was listed as one of “The 100 Best Companies to Work for in America” in Robert Leve

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123