Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are Responsible Parties acting only as Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) required to (directly) maintain a US Service Center?

0
Posted

Are Responsible Parties acting only as Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) required to (directly) maintain a US Service Center?

0

While a Responsible Party is not required to directly control or maintain a US Service Center, identification of a Service Center for the Product is required. Question: Are parties filing with ACTA to revise/update previously registered products required to submit all items currently specified by ACTA; e.g., Indemnification & Liability Statement, and a Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity or TCB Certificate? Answer: Parties modifying and/or expanding the registration ‘umbrella’ of previously approved products shall declare (via the SDoC method) or have a TCB certify that the products comply with the relevant Part 68 rules and/or ACTA-adopted technical criteria. Parties utilizing the SDoC method must provide the SDoC with the modified and/or additional products, in accordance with the FCC R&O.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123