Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are raw numbers the best measure of an atrocitys impact? Wouldn it be better to calculate death tolls as a percentage of the overall population per year, instead of just the absolute total?

0
Posted

Are raw numbers the best measure of an atrocitys impact? Wouldn it be better to calculate death tolls as a percentage of the overall population per year, instead of just the absolute total?

0

Unfortunately, numbers like that are often slanted by how you chose your populations and times. They open up too many possibilities to manipulate the numbers.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123