Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Are photo specimens a replacement for fluid-preserved specimens?

photo replacement specimens
0
Posted

Are photo specimens a replacement for fluid-preserved specimens?

0

No. However, we believe photo specimens are a good compromise for two reasons. First, a scientific collecting permit is required to collect animals for museum preservation. Many biologists, educators, conservation workers, and enthusiasts who wouldn’t normally apply for or receive a permit can still contribute photo specimens. Second, fluid-preserved specimens simply aren’t needed to verify and document a locality occurrence. Some species or populations considered rare or endangered cannot sustain permanent specimen removal. Even common species are not worth sacrificing solely for the purpose of putting another dot on a map.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123