Are more divisions needed, similar to the WIBC structure?
We actually created the classified division for the 180 and under shooter in 1998 legislation. Teams under 900, doubles under 360 and individuals under 180 now compete in a separate division than those above that average. So, we have divisionalized it. The percentage of bowlers who fall into that is about 14-15 percent. Is there a thought of additional divisions? No. Is it right for the 181 average to go against the 230-plus? If he didn’t think it was fair or didn’t think it is worth the $100 entry fee, then he wouldn’t pay it. He understands he’s up against the 220s or 230s, and he’s out there for the experience and the camaraderie and the participation record. So as long as they keep coming, that won’t change? I don’t think so. The entries are increasing on an annual basis. The top bowlers are going trying to win that eagle, not the money. There is another group who just want to cash, and another who just want to have fun. The divisionalization in ’98 was the first time we’ve changed
